As we can see, need for food products is rising owing to some reasons that growth of population is one of them. In fact, there should be diverse accurate assessment with international areas to address the problem. I think this trouble can be solved with precisely scrutiny and applying other methods.
To bring with, it appears that increasing population is the main issue for rising demand of foods. This matter should be managed by governments to hinder other consequences. For illustration, India is one of the country with approximately one fifth proportion of world's population that confronts with starvation then famine. Actually, this disaster happened on account of growth of birth rate without any control and food chain was not produced enough.
Other matter that I can mention is about waste of foods around the world. Some scientists exhibit that annually waste of food in Europe continent can cover foods for people in Africa for ten years who suffer from starvation and lack of crops.
On the other hand, diverse territories should be gathered to legislate some restrict rules about how can to control the population and developing food products. For instant, in Norway government declared that each family should not born more than two kids because of handling situation and better welfare. In addition, China is one of the populous country that preferred to promote the agricultural lands and approaches to produce more foods.
In conclusion, however, demand for foods is growing and many people are suffering from lack of nutrition, there are numerous ways to solve this problem. Government should try to make a better occasion for people with precise plans.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, so, then, as to, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17582417582 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65733180769 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575091575092 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5635955494 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.928571429 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221977074544 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793906913376 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497304564153 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133546423051 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419033085735 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.