With the advent of technology, social media has become a source of socialization for most of the individuals in the society, irrespective of their age, culture or status. The youth is the prominent section of the society, whom the internet has been conveniently available. This unrestricted usage of media can lead to various problems for which amicable solutions are discussed in this essay.
The first and foremost problem can be that of access to various inappropriate content available on the internet, by the youngsters. This content can, sometimes, leave a negative impact on the young mind, which can in the long run affect their overall personality development. It could also be detrimental in the character building of the young ones at the same time leading them to take some immature decisions of their life. To elaborate, a person viewing porn content, could be vulnerable to committing a rape or any such crime which could not be acceptable in the society. His ability to analyse right or wrong, can definitely be affected by such content.
Secondly, unsupervised access of internet leads to wastage of time on unproductive work. Majority of people spend their quality time in front of their mobile phone chatting on social handles or browsing the numerous posts. This could be profitable for so called social sites but increases the number of unemployed youth glued to the internet. The young people, instead of thinking about their future, waste precious time and money on internet just liking certain posts or criticizing something thereby reducing their own creativity and productivity.
One solution to such problem can be by providing sufficient job opportunities for the various sections of the society so that people do not time to waste on such unproductive work but can on the other hand think positively on their own life. Besides this, filtering of the internet content by the telecom companies can also be beneficial in eradicating such problem to a large extent.
To conclude, social media, no doubt is an important medium for keeping in touch with the outside world, but its optimal utilization can be done by accessing it for some fruitful purpose which is beneficial for the society as well as the individual using it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, no doubt, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12162162162 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84334729026 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5279943287 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225067257038 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860886704836 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499774329509 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133177440173 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339082758232 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.