Development in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both view and give your opinion?
It is true that technological development have a negative impact on environment. Some people wonder whether should live simpler lives or rely on technology to solve the problems. In my opinion, I argue that technology can help us to deal with these problems.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why people think that sophisticated technologies inflict damage on the ecosystems on which all living things depend. One reason is that people consume too much energy by overusing technological devices such as air-conditioning, water heaters and the private car. If we aren’t indifferent to this, the level of the emission of green gases will increase. But this will involve leading simpler lives. Other reason is that chemical fertilizers and weedkillers is a main method of farming nowadays. As a result, this pollutes the water and the soil. The governments is making every effort to do overcome these situations.
On the other hand, I consider that advances in technologies bring a good life to people in the future. Firstly, renewable energy resources is already starting to grow. This raises the prospect of decreasing dependence on fossil fuels, cleaner air. For example, Japan is a country leading the way of developing more eco-friendly cars, buses and lorries. Secondly, cleaner technologies such as waste treatment, are being introduced into many countries, and technology is enabling plastics and other products to be recycled.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the pros is outweighed than the cons technology make.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...the water and the soil. The governments is making every effort to do overcome thes...
^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cons'' or 'con's'?
Suggestion: cons'; con's
...me that the pros is outweighed than the cons technology make.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28455284553 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0197534173 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642276422764 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1256868063 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.25 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.375 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282821558785 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792542440334 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104291587775 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173908017347 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165546829432 0.056905535591 291% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.