It is true that key positions in the government is possessed by youngsters. Some people think that young leaders can help their country to improve while others have a suspicion that young people are not able to do this. In my opinion, I consider that the pros are outweighed than the cons the young generation can make.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why young leaders are on suspicion of leading their countries. One reason is that young people do not attain valuable experiences in the field relating to politics because of they have not faced many challenges in their career. Foreign relations play an important role in developing the economy in all nations. If this relationship is not positive, foreign trade will be stagnant. As a result, the economy could suffer from an economic crisis, which can affect the lives of many people. Secondly, the competence of the young in sitting down under pressure to make their countries better is not high. They are likely to make a big mistake and not putting all faith in their leadership is understandable.
One the other hand, it seems to me that young leaders is beneficial in some ways. Firstly, their youth is a huge advantage and allows them to be creative and up-to-date. This is likely to result in innovative breakthrough policies and styles of management. Secondly, the young have a long period of time to contribute to their nations. For example, with the same abilities and qualifications a younger candidate is more likely to be elected than an older counterpart in some countries because of his longer anticipated time of devotion to public service in the future.
In conclusion, although there are arguments that differ about appoint youngsters to important positions. It seems to me that young generations should be given opportunities to be parts of leaders in all nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...ences in the field relating to politics because of they have not faced many challenges in their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...gement. Secondly, the young have a long period of time to contribute to their nations. For exa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95512820513 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80423625251 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535256410256 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9345116031 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9411764706 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157604404377 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460969188672 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576040240005 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102823625682 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715983037691 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.