There have been many environmental problems caused by the advancement in technology. Many individuals opine that accepting an ordinary life can arguably eradicate this problem. On the other hand, some people think that all these environmental issues can be tackled with the help of the latest technology. Both the contrasting views are discussed in this essay, and I believe that people should adopt eco-friendly ways to live their lives, and with a collaborative effort, we can curb this issue.
Many people argue that by living a simple life we can fight the environmental issues up to a great extent, and this can be achieved by stop using products that are contributing, directly or indirectly, to these problems. Apart from that, nowadays, people living in cities are completely dependent on technology for their day-to-day work, these people are expected to come out from their comfort zones and stop using products and services which pollute our environment. For example, a survey in the United States of America shows that many professionals working in big industries prefer to go to their offices by bicycle. Such changes in their lifestyles helped the country to control the pollution caused by cars up to a great extent.
On the contrary, many people opine that technology is the right medium to eradicate problems related to our ecosystem. With the invention of eco-friendly products and services, which cause minimal harm to our environment, all these problems can be solved. Many big automotive industries, Tesla, for example, are adopting new technology which requires little or no fossil fuels to run car engines. All such initiatives, which demand an innovative approach assisted with the latest technology, can mitigate big problems, like greenhouse gases emission.
To conclude, many people believe that living an ordinary life is the right approach to control the factors contributing to ecological issues. On the other hand, individuals argue that with the combination of innovation and technology, such problems can be eliminated from our lives. I opine that changes in our lifestyles won't be enough to bring a change, and there is a demand for innovative thinking which can be collaborated with science to tackle such problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, apart from, for example, on the contrary, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27777777778 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90807729957 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491666666667 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3279996718 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252126315509 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952592723717 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565762928004 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167472891831 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711705298786 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.