Many people from past generations believe in traditional ideas on the right way of living, thinking, and behaving. Whereas, some individuals opine that these old beliefs do not imply to the present generation to prepare for their modern lives in the future. I agree with the above notion and believe that in order to meet the present-day challenges, people should adopt new ways to grow as individuals.
It is often argued by many people that older generations were happier because of their lifestyles and approach towards life. They had fewer expectations from others, and materialistic things never mattered to them. However, in the present-day, individuals always have a competition to succeed in life, and emotions are immaterial to them. Furthermore, the present-day generations face several challenges today during their day-to-day life, like corruption, which cannot be tackled with old traditional values. For example, in India, there were fewer police stations in the past; however, with an increased crime rate people need advanced security arrangements to live a peaceful life.
Secondly, the present-day generations have several needs like a lavish lifestyle and social status, which can only be gained with a new approach to live life. Consequently, people work day and night to earn money and fulfill their dreams. Not only will this make them wealthier, but they are also able to make their families happy. With more competition to grow and succeed in their life, people follow different success strategies to remain at the top. For example, many professionals working in big Industries work many hours a week to afford a luxurious life and fulfill the dreams of their families.
Taking all this into consideration, many people think that old ideas related to behavior and mentality were the right way to spend a life. I believe it is imperative for the younger generations to continuously evolve and find out new ways to grow and succeed in their lives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23101265823 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83916142658 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566455696203 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1535551182 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.2 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287209658522 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972985177123 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715124766078 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196909244535 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661667317541 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.