It is a debatable topic whether individuals should be responsible to keep their funds saved for their well beings after their retirements. I certainly agree with this viewpoint as people should not be relied on anyone for their care during difficult times, and should invest their money for unforeseen situations after their retirement.
Many people, in cities, live a lavished lifestyle and disagree with the opinion of saving cash for their future; this often results in difficulties in uncertain situations in life as they have no financial support in such critical situations. For this reason, it is always advisable to live a simple life, and a small proportion of our income should be saved for our necessities which arise after the period of earning is over. Furthermore, many old aged people live an isolated life, therefore, they have to be financially prepared to take care of their health. For example, in Canada, almost 70% of youngsters invest their money in different schemes for their futures and ensure that they do not rely on anyone during any uncertainties.
Secondly, in almost every nation, there are central government schemes that provide pensions to the elderly after their retirement from jobs. In spite of such initiatives; there are a large proportion of citizens who are unable to avail these benefits due to irregularities in such programmes. Apart from this, it is a cumbersome task for any government authority to bear the health care cost of all the old people of the country, and make sure that these benefits are directly accessible by every group of the society. All these problems can be resolved if a small portion of our income is saved for our future. For instance, people in India save a part of their monthly wage as a provident fund and use the same money after retirement.
Taking all this into consideration, some individuals argue that people should be responsible for their own care after retiring from their jobs. I believe it is of utmost importance to put aside some money from our monthly income for unforeseen circumstances in the future. Also, without relying on government schemes, people should invest their money to insure their lives against any misfortunes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10584958217 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79180904582 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495821727019 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2381489236 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.928571429 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239699320224 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988638099158 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524205203432 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164554880717 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296072804916 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.