Many individuals opine that public taxes should be efficiently utilized on the promotion of living a healthy life than on the cure of illnesses. I am completely in the agreement with the above notion as it is comparatively cheaper to promote a healthy lifestyle than to treat diseases. Moreover, the vast of money spent on the treatment of illnesses can be used for other useful purposes.
It is believed by people that prevention is always better than cure, and when it comes to our health it is always advisable to spread awareness on adopting a healthy lifestyle than to spend money on medical bills. Apart from that, it is a proven fact that the cost of promoting a disciplined life which includes a healthy diet and regular exercise is much less than the treatment of comorbidities. Many developed nations, Canada, for example, spend millions of dollars on spreading awareness on the importance of a healthy lifestyle. They publish several adverts on monthly basis to educate people on living a stress-free life. Such initiatives bend the cover of people suffering from diseases.
Secondly, people spend a vast sum of money on the treatment of illnesses and sometimes they spend their life savings to cure the diseases. Not only this impacts their financial status but it is also detrimental to the local economy. Conversely, if people start living a healthy life they can stay away from illnesses and their hard-earned money can be utilized for other useful things, like traveling. For example, a survey done in the United States shows that the regions where people suffer from any disease are less developed due to lack of manpower, and less physically fit adults to perform difficult tasks at jobs.
To conclude, it is often debated by individuals that people’s tax should be used to promote healthy living than on huge medical bills. I completely agree with this statement as the cost of living a healthy life is much less than the treatment of many deadly diseases. Also instead of spending their money on the treatment of illnesses, individuals can spend their money for various other useful purposes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, apart from, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72444117545 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477401129944 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2507777704 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324870001964 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113274666757 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625692512573 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214827724 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219574843481 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.