It is often discussed by some individuals that financial assistance should not be provided to poor countries if there are needy people in their own nation. I certainly disagree with this notion and believe that there are much more underprivileged people in some poor countries who struggle to fulfil their basic necessities as compared to a small proportion of disadvantaged people in developed nations.
In many developed countries, like, Canada, despite all the basic services and facilities by the governments, like free education, low health care costs, a small percentage of people fail to make their lives better and live a disadvantaged life. They face such situations because of their lifestyle and their low calibre to use those opportunities to learn and grow. Apart from that, it is nearly impossible for any government to fulfil the needs of these people for their whole lives. For example, in The United States of America, despite the high quality of education and abundant job opportunities, there is almost 10% unemployment among the youth as they are involved in illicit activities.
On the other hand, there are some poor countries, like, Somalia, where a majority of the people die every day because of hunger due to bad governance and lack of facilities. In these states, common men struggle to afford food for a single time in a day. Furthermore, this number of underprivileged people in such failed nations is much higher than a small proportion of disadvantaged citizens in affluent nations. Therefore, it is imperative to provide monetary assistance and other support to these individuals from underdeveloped nations that deserve such help. Some rich countries, England, For example, provide medical aid and financial assistance to Nepal every year, despite 5% homeless people in their own country.
To conclude, it is evident that international aid by rich nations should be provided to poor countries as there always be a small proportion of disadvantaged people in affluent nations, and these governments possess a greater responsibility towards a large group of people in poor nations where survival of citizens is at stake due to lack of basic needs and poor governance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...countries who struggle to fulfill their basic necessities as compared to a small proportion of di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, apart from, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2209631728 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98990750738 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501416430595 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7308831763 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.583333333 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4166666667 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267555454086 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101574525738 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590227117478 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174598461883 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437940839805 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.