Digital Digital communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and social media, has improved communication and connection between people.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons for your answers and include examp

Recent years Communication applications such as electronic mail, number of messaging software like Whatsapp, Facebook messenger et cetera and social conversation tool kind of Facebook have developed enormously. These applications build implications among people for making interaction but it doesn't devote connection with people. I partially agree that digital mechanisms evolved only for simplifying the conversation among people, it doesn't endow the robust relationship between people. This essay will denote the repercussion of digital communication as well as does it create a robust connection with people.

On the first hand, Advances in communication application is becoming widespread all over the world. This gives abundant features and communicates effectively with others without putting a lot of effort. Because everything is happening through the air that is the network. To exemplify, 10 years before most of the people had communication through the postal service. The technology has evolved and improved communication mechanism to the next level. According to the report which is unveiled by the popular news stated that 97.3% of people have been using communication software like Whatsapp, an immediate message delivery application.

On the flip side, although it has plenty of features to make people communicate effectively, it does not endow the strong relationship among people. Why I stating this information here?. Olden days many people meet others while playing, visiting the festival and attending marriage functions. But now most of the people chatting with others through the applications with one hand mobiles. As a result, people failed to make a robust relationship like before. In addition to that, many of us do not know what close relatives and neighbors.

To recapitulate what I described briefly about communication and connection, communication do people communicate with each other but it will not create the platform to build the relationship in society.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ng people for making interaction but it doesnt devote connection with people. I partia...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 436, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...fying the conversation among people, it doesnt endow the robust relationship between p...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 613, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...create a robust connection with people. On the first hand, Advances in communica...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...others without putting a lot of effort. Because everything is happening through the air...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...e strong relationship among people. Why I stating this information here?. Olden d...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, first, if, so, well, while, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14398720665 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576666666667 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7122284892 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.176470588 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267182002039 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814228740208 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620470437405 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167680035706 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631124324366 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.