Discuss the ways in which technology has changed the interaction and communication between people. Is this change desirable?
Technology changed the thinking level of human being. There are tremendous change in interaction and communication media because of technology. Technology implement in such a way that human can share live update with another person who at another location. Even though technology made life of human flexible but on other hand there are also drawback with it.
Technology has made easier for people to communicate and stay in touch with school, college friend after completion of graduation through face book, twitter. Parents can talk to their children through video conference. Now days, people can make new friends through social websites. This is creation of technology which come close different culture people, their thoughts.
The websites are more useful for sportsperson and film stars, they can communicate with their fans. It's helpful for them to know about expectation of fans from them, comment from their fans they are more inspired. It's useful for large organization to post their events, so that their client get update from the websites.
There are some drawback, people are more interested in sharing their photos, e-mail ids on social website. It's possibility of that someone with malicious intent gets hold of this confidential data, it could be disastrous. It lead to cyber crime. Social networking sites allow people to let others know what is happening in their lives. Person lose privacy because of such websites.
In conclusion, technology have made human life easier, but on other hand it may leads to cyber crime which is against human being. The major prevention before any usage of communication of media be aware of it and then use it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...ential data, it could be disastrous. It lead to cyber crime. Social networking sites...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21111111111 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.608230615 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596296296296 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.585519811 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1666666667 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38888888889 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192997882764 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620542241765 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699885912958 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102236439866 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710832010731 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.