Do the dangers derived from the use of chemicals in food production and preservation outweigh the advantages?
It is universally acknowledge that technical advances are integral to boosting the agricultural output and maintaining the quality of food. Otherwise, it is also the root cause which leads to the significant increase of diseases through meals in recent years. I believe that the benefits cannot overcome the drawbacks of chemicals.
On the one hand, there are many advantages of chemicals due to its holistic potential. First of all, preservative substance is not too pricey and it is really common. As a result, the farmers and suppliers ought to utilize it to lengthen the life and quality of their products as easy as pie. Secondly, chemical is not only varied but it also very helpful to facilitate the longer age of goods. Exporting perfectly exemplified this circumstance, when delivering goods between countries it takes a long time to transport and the quality of products are no longer as good as the authentic taste. That is the prime reason why chemical is the optimal solutions to address this situation.
On the other hand, there is a dark side of chemicals. Based on the reasonable price of preservatives, many suppliers abuse it to keep their foods longer. In addition, this illegal activity may result in a host of detrimental effects on the sustainable development of global health. According to the analysis of many scientists, the overuse of chemicals pose a devastating threat to people’s health because of the residue of preservative in foods.
In conclusion, in spite of the fact that chemicals can boost the revenue of socio-economic, I strongly believe that the drawbacks still outweigh the benefits in this situation and the government should find out some drastic measures to mitigate this controversial issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'acknowledged'.
Suggestion: acknowledged
It is universally acknowledge that technical advances are integral to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18727915194 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05604889992 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583038869258 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2697005231 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148688426447 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420791260013 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323207287668 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731565637495 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379210698976 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.