Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend money on improving internet access rather than improving public transportation.
Even though a vast majority of people explicitly state that governments have to expend more money in order to enhance internet access than to improve public transportation, there are still some people who utterly oppose this stance. From my point of view, fostering internet access entails more boons, and I uphold this idea for two core reasons, which are elucidated below.
Internet, in the first place, is more vital for modern society since most of the devices highly depend on it, and even public transportations need internet. A compelling example of this argument is my country; In Azerbaijan buses, metros, railways all depend on internet since devices utilized in order to control roads require internet. Furthermore, dissemination of internet renders companies, restaurants- altogether, work places to depend on internet otherwise they will lose their customers, or not be much productive. Take, for instance, a company akin to Amazon, which tend to sell products via online websites. If they lose their internet connection, even for one hour, they will acquire an array of negative feedbacks, not to mention lose their reputation among people; thus, fostering internet access will lessen the probability of this type of situations.
In addition, according to a research conducted by an esteemed university, it became evident that people are prone to prefering internet to public transportations, and besides, they will be more satisfied with the improvement of internet rather than improvement of buses, metros and etcetera. Taking into account that the chief objective of governments is rendering their citizens to be content, internet access becomes one of the priorities of country. Moreover, interned access is also fundamental for technology since technology itself depends on internet. A lucid example that sheds the spotlight on this thesis is cell phones; in order to improve cell phones, companies are endeavoring to add features, and they need strong internet connection. Consequently, without internet access it is arduous to enhance anything.
In light of thoughts elaborated upon, I would like to conclude that internet is integral part of twenty-first century, so governments have to spend their budget so as to render internet access prevalent. A philosopher, whose name eludes my mind right now, once mentioned, "internet has tremendous impact on everything, and having problem regarding internet can engender a myriad of drawbacks in every field".
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Even though a vast majority of people ex...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reasons, which are elucidated below. Internet, in the first place, is more vi...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ability of this type of situations. In addition, according to a research con...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s it is arduous to enhance anything. In light of thoughts elaborated upon, I ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... governments have to spend their budget so as to render internet access prevalent. A phi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of drawbacks in every field'.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, as to, for instance, in addition, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52480417755 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99679536701 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590078328982 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7374389525 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.142857143 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3571428571 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243819644141 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870158810378 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642430872135 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158786323977 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649163076652 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.