Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Undoubtedly, our modern life is much more complicated than the past, and governments have limited budget to spend. While many people believe that the government should spend money to improve Internet access, others agree with the obverse idea. Nevertheless, from my point of view, I think it would be better, if government spend money to improve public transportation. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, public transportation has plenty of critical impacts on people lives. In fact, a better public transportation, which needs a large amount of money to be created, can improve quality of life in people of a society. The government by spending money on traveling systems and funding private companies will enhances people's satisfaction. Moreover, a novel transportation systems are less harmful for the envirnoment and produce slight amount of air pollotion, which is a major public health issue today. To cast light on this, in my country, the government has been started to create new subway train systems in big cities that are fast and very cheap for passengers. Although our internet access is not better than other countries, people still find new transportation system more useful than the internet. Consequensly, people are satisfied by novelty and cost of these transportations systems, which was not possible by improving internet access, at least in my country.
Furthermore, only small percent of people use internet as a practical tool for shopping, or a way to avoid meeting their families that lives far away. In contrast, a lot of people like traditional ways of shoppying, and almost all people of a country need to use the public transportation. This is obvious that the government should spend the money based on how many people will get benefit from new budget funding approach. For example, in our capital, ten million people spend almost one hour in public buses or subway trains. If the bus stations and buses don't have a effective and new cooling system, people will bother and annoyed for houres in hot summers. As the public transportaion is very crucial for most of people in my country, whitout having a good transportation, improvment in other facilities will not satisfy people.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the government should spend money to improve public transportation. this is because this can be more benefitial for society and envrnoment. Also, this help a lot of people comperd to internet access.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'enhance'
Suggestion: enhance
...tems and funding private companies will enhances peoples satisfaction. Moreover, a novel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...y trains. If the bus stations and buses dont have a effective and new cooling system...
^^^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...If the bus stations and buses dont have a effective and new cooling system, peopl...
^
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ublic transportaion is very crucial for most of people in my country, whitout having a good tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...money to improve public transportation. this is because this can be more benefitial ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, while, at least, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2102.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12682926829 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93209282803 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529268292683 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9985937191 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343940480459 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117180018602 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747448881037 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25582249801 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902924564602 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.