Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Undoubtedly, our modern life is very complicated than the past. This is obvious that people want comfortble life and they have a lot of demands as well as resources. Although, human life is ephemeral and transitory, human beings always have a great attempt to find a way of success. Moreover, during the history governements had important influence in their people’s life. Some times this impact was harmfull for people and some times that was very critical for survive of that country’s people and governement. In my point of view, also having an sofisticated internet access can be beneficial for people on the other hand transportation is very important for our life.
There is no doubt that our modern life is related to the internet and we use internet daily for lots of our needs and demands. For example students and professors extremley are related to the internet. Their research and communication with other universities is based on using internet. On the other hand, people use internet for communication with each other and shearing pictures and massages. Access to the internet and having a fast internet is important in modern life. But we should consider that without internet our life will be chealenging or not this is jost an addiction for us to use our cellphones and download some fillms and pictures from internet. Actually, if we think about this facility we will find that also this has plenty of benefits for us but this is not priority especially in the undeveloped countries. Vividly, people have other demands that is more important than internet like public health, economy, food production and transportation.
In spite of what mentioned before, our life needs a good transportation system and facilities. This is important because of some important resons. On of the most important reson is safety of roads and highways. In my country, every year a lurge number of passengers died because of accidents and the main problem is old and dengreus roads. People relly need a safe and new transportation system. Another reson is fast transportation and people if are able to go from one city to another in only one hour instead of spending three hours, they will be very saticfied from government that made or creates these transportation equipments. Furthermore, this is critical for our envirnoment. Consider that we use electro cars or trains and these are very good for our nature because they do not make CO2 and other harmful gases.
All in all, Also internet is a big part of our society, this is not critical and we need good transportation instead of good access to the internet.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-08-12 | Mizanur | 84 | view |
2021-01-19 | epidemiology1 | 73 | view |
2020-06-29 | epidemiology1 | 67 | view |
- technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 56
- The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 73
- technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 78
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 546, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ement. In my point of view, also having an sofisticated internet access can be ben...
^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: One
...rtant because of some important resons. On of the most important reson is safety o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, for example, no doubt, as well as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 439.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98177676538 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86963874222 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464692482916 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7040717857 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0869565217 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0869565217 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196571814222 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669390800171 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458252869415 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123922241353 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309033686227 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.