In this sophisticated era, there are plenty of things happen or can be supposed. Card less society can be assumed as realistic or could be contradicted. It has plethora of reasons to discuss this substantial issue. However, it might has overwhelmed pros over it's cons. In thesis, I will discuss both assertions about digital transactions and provide a generalized nutshell.
To initiate with, online spending wealth over using card transaction is itself a blessing. Electric payments are more convenient rather than carry a card everywhere. For instance, having card with you everywhere is more pathetic than doing online shopping. Therefore, folks should need to ameliorate the society with make some experiments in every month/year for the development of the nation.
Having a contradicting side in the notion upholding an opposing viewpoint on affinity card less society, more people are not familiar with e-shopping, digital payments so they habitual to carry card to make their life more comfy. Even older age masses are unaware of high technologies that now are in used in our society for overall growth of the multicultural world. Hence, it is so obvious that downside of platinum cards cannot be overlooked.
To put both perspective in conclusion for getting consequences, about not to use cards much in daily routine is not so required. While it is unreservedly salient that its boon are balancing it's demerits as well. It can be said by determining that it has more benefits than having causes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g. Electric payments are more convenient rather than carry a card everywhere. For...
^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Hence, it is so obvious that downside of platinum cards cannot be overlooked. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20491803279 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95185546484 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631147540984 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6824970633 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6666666667 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157875594208 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480275732113 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589855934214 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884168801281 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377675703224 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.