Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or it is the responsibility of producers to avoid extra packaging of products? give
your views and relevant examples with your own experience
Packaged goods has become a huge threat to the environment. Over packaging of goods should be reduced by producers as well as People should avoid consumption of packaged goods as they will be harmful for themselves and environment. This essay will discuss on why packaging should be avoided.
Nowadays, people are attracted towards commodities that seems to have attractive packing as there are many brands. Plastic contributes a high amount for packing goods. Once after the product is consumed people tend to throw away as garbage. A recent report published that 70% of garbage is accumulated from plastics used in packaged goods. Since these wastes are non-bio-degradable they are burnt. For example, in a remote place near Chennai garbage is being dumped and among them plastics are not degradable they are burnt. This results in polluting the air and a threat to the people who inhale it.
On the other hand producers can make several measures to reduce the packaging of products by replacing the plastics with eco-friendly substance like paper etc. This could also reduce the amount of preservatives and additives used. Hence could also help in garbage reduction. For example, A super market nearby has replaced the plastic cover with paper bags for several goods. Paper is recyclable and does not cause any harm to environment.
In a way we can conclude that it is the responsibility for both consumer and producers to avoid over packaging and packaged goods to save and preserve the Environment and also to promote alternate materials that are bio-degradable and eco-friendly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Nowadays, people are attracted towards commodities that seems to have attractiv...
^^
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ibutes a high amount for packing goods. Once after the product is consumed people te...
^^^^
Line 2, column 341, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d from plastics used in packaged goods. Since these wastes are non-bio-degradable the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nt of preservatives and additives used. Hence could also help in garbage reduction. F...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t are bio-degradable and eco-friendly.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, well, for example, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18604651163 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89045433772 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554263565891 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4467828195 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.625 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2136567919 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601413415936 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761601623786 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141851462071 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745036928381 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.