Do you think that technological advancement has brought more harm than good Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion

Technological advancement started with the beginning of existence of human. From the inventions like fire, knife to high-end computers has revolutionized our lives to great extent. It has improvised each and every aspect of life starting from education, medical, transport, etc.

I strongly opine that the accelerating rate in technology has brought better life, my view point is supported by various perceptible facts, firstly let us consider the transportation.
Gone are the days when people have to travel for days to see their family members, smart phones has reduced the time from days to few seconds. Video Chat has enabled people to see them while talking, thus bringing the near and dar one closer while they are thousands of miles away.

Another remarkable feature technological advancement is in field of transportation. It is now feasible to travel thousands of miles, which was nightmare century ago. Airplanes, helicopters, metro, bullet trains has not only made the long distance travel easier but has also improvised the day-to-day transport. My opinion is further bolstered by the advancement in medical field. Various digonstatic machines such as ECG, X-Ray, etc. helps in diagnosing big disease easily. Better medical equipment, treatments method is another great factor

However, there are few negative aspects too. Though technology is helping us to great extend in our life but too much of everything is very bad. For example, human has become more lethargic and inactive with the excessive usages of gadgets hence impacting health.

Recapitulating, the above highlighted reason clearly justify that technological advancement has brought more good and by better over-sight and control use we can reduce the bad impact to great extend

Votes
Average: 7.5 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 6, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...t us consider the transportation. Gone are the days when people have to travel for...
^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...t phones has reduced the time from days to few seconds. Video Chat has enabled peo...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, while, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47080291971 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93308296019 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660583941606 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9008668327 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6875 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142792358041 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428817859455 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061431989938 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761149262923 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687469364497 0.056905535591 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.