It is true that technological breakthroughs have brought many changes to every facet of mankind. Whether new technology make modern living easier or not has been a heated topic recently. Both of these views will be discussed before my opinion is stated.
On the one hand, people who advocate the idea that high- tech devices hold the power to take favorable impacts on our lives have their own justifications. First, with the aid of new technology, especially the internet, can enable children to self- study and explore their fields of interests. In parallel with the widespread use of the internet, the proliferation of free educational websites and online informative resources has made the access to information easier than ever before. By only browing those sites, students can enrich their knowledge of any subject. For instance, children who are interested in English can improve their skills by watching videos made by experienced native teachers and intimating the ways they speak and write. In addition, the introduction of social networks such as Facebook, Twitter,... have facilitated long- distance communication, allowing people to connect with one another no matter where they are. By using those advanced tools, people from different countries could be brought together through text-messaging or video calls. This was never the case in the past when they rarely had a chance to communicate or meet with anyone outside their immediate circle of community.
On the other hand, it is argued by some people that those modern breakthroughs are the culprits of contributing to worsen our lives. First, it makes modern workers even stressful. As there is no escaping from always- on connectivity, modern citizens can never get away from their work and problems. Even when they are on a vacation, few people can resist the temptation to check their work emails. Moreover, electronic devices can have the result of discouraging real interaction. Young people now show a tendency of immersing themselves in social networks available on Ipads or smart phones rather than real- life circle of friends. Consequently, they are no longer forming close and supportive relationships which are the fabric of the society. Society on the whole is gradually becoming disjointed as well.
In conclusion, there is no doubt about the significant influence of high- tech tools on human being. However, i am strongly convinced that the merits of technology are much weightier than the drawbacks based on a wide range of advantages it offers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 820, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ocial networks such as Facebook, Twitter,... have facilitated long- distance commu...
^^
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...ailable on Ipads or smart phones rather then real- life circle of friends. Consequen...
^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...gh- tech tools on human being. However, i am strongly convinced that the merits o...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, it is true, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24384236453 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88946491558 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618226600985 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4341570722 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7727272727 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68181818182 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111990129786 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289376268349 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430627264216 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716014739125 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412055396303 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.