In this contemporary era, as people are fond of luxurious lifestyle, many people prefer giant supermarkets rather than local vendors. While some people claim that local communities would suffer because of this trend, others contend that the expansion of supermarkets are much needed for the society. As far as I am concerned, I partially agree with the statements and hence, I will discuss both the views in this essay.
Nowadays, many giant supermarkets are expanding across the globe as they have a better financial support. Whereas, the local markets could not compete with these giants and are suffering to survive in the market. In addition, as supermarkets are able to provide myriad discounts to their customers, the local business are pressurized to offer discounts, which is hardly possible for them. As a result, many local communities are forced to shut down their shops and pursue their career as daily wage labors. To exemplify, when Walmart started its business in the United States of America, hundreds of small vendors closed their operations, as they were not able to compete with it.
However, there are many alternatives which these people could take to develop their business. Firstly, with the influence of internet in the retail sector, people are slowly moving towards e-shopping. Hence, small vendors could make use of this technology to endure their business. For example, in the year 2013, many local grocery sellers in Haryana have merged their business with online grocery service platform ‘Grofers’, where they were able to compete with the legendary supermarkets. Further, governments offer loan facilities to the small and medium vendors to develop their business. For instance, the Indian government offered loan facilities of up to rupees 10 lakhs to micro enterprises under the scheme ‘Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana’ in the year 2015.
To conclude, I personally believe that although supermarkets have negative impacts on the local business, yet there are plethora of options for these vendors to survive in the market.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, still, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33742331288 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70794099066 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546012269939 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7209473804 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251781469304 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830194404766 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524364796053 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153017992385 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596336528214 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.