The diameter of the universe is approximated to be 93 billion light years, of which the milky way galaxy, where our solar system exists, constitutes only 52,850 light years. So, the speculation on extra-terrestrial life forms seems to be authentic. To evince the same, some cosmologists around the globe are constantly insisting on sending interstellar messages, which could be deciphered by the other living creatures in the space; however, a few astronomers forewarn about the perils of colonization by aliens. Although, I demand that scientists must avoid performing these activities which can jeopardize life of the human beings, still I would delve into both the views in the essay.
As the technologies that humans have created, require exploitation of the earth by some means, the planet is predicted to become uninhabitable for the humans in the future. To conquer the same, some cosmologists like Stephen William Hawking have insisted on establishing a connection with other life forms in the space, who might be technologically ahead of us and through whom, we could learn and develop technologies that might be centuries ahead of all our scientific inventions. For example, there are high chances that space beings could have solved the mystery of ‘black hole’ and time travel, in which we are still at the early stage.
On the other hand, a handful of astronomers disagree on this idea of communicating with aliens, fearing the consequences it could have. Life forms in space could vary from single-celled organisms to humongous creatures. As we are oblivious what kind of impact the radiations from those messages being sent in space could cause to them, these scientists demand on avoiding such experiments. Also, the repercussions of inviting alien’s attention have been clearly demonstrated in the popular science fiction movie ‘Star Trek’, where the aliens try to invade earth by eliminating all the living creatures of the planet.
To conclude, instead of leaping over the technology at the cost of human life, it is still better to make a slow but safe technological progress.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, then, for example, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26331360947 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00707154137 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597633136095 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7599734919 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.25 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213493530338 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742804110809 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453676985738 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114356342873 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578536799327 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.