A lot of money is spent on scientific studies and discoveries. According to some sections of society, only regulatory bodies such as government organizations should hold the supreme power in overseeing these research projects, whereas others feel private organizations should also be entitled. In my opinion, individual companies should assist these research projects mainly from a financial standpoint. Moreover with their intellectual knowledge spanning beyond various geographical locations, they are more privy to international exposure.
Firstly, although the country’s regulatory bodies pump in millions of dollars in the field of research and development, there is still an upper cap in the cash inflow as the funds are divided among other sectors such as poverty or education. However, this is not the case in private organizations as their prime objective is the research. Tesla is a case in point. As of 2019, Elon Musk , the founder of Telsa, an automotive industry is developing a technology to reach Mars.
Secondly, if a research project is funded by a government organization, only citizens from that specific country where these fundings occur can be a part of it due to confidentiality and security reasons. As a result of which the knowledge that comes into the project is restricted. This is not the case in privately-owned organizations. Due to their diverse pool of scientists, more international exposure is brought into their research. One clear example is Astrazenca, a pharmaceutical company employing doctors from all around the world for the development of the Covid-19 vaccine.
To conclude, the prime focus of research is for the betterment of mankind, and with better capital funding and knowledge that privately-owned organizations possess, they should be able to fund and control the research projects across the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...cts mainly from a financial standpoint. Moreover with their intellectual knowledge spann...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more privy to international exposure. Firstly, although the country’s regulato...
^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s a case in point. As of 2019, Elon Musk , the founder of Telsa, an automotive ind...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...developing a technology to reach Mars. Secondly, if a research project is funde...
^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o confidentiality and security reasons. As a result of which the knowledge that co...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e development of the Covid-19 vaccine. To conclude, the prime focus of research...
^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the betterment of mankind, and with better capital funding and knowledge tha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48780487805 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24918192161 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592334494774 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.144166412 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261381325831 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747269671648 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080829652933 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166527577061 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687944089999 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.