Being an integral part of people’s life, technology, as well as science, brought about the similarity of lifestyle for people from all walks of life. It is often argued that it is a positive tendency, while I believe that living in a global village may lead to losing cultural diversity that distinguishes human being and in turn has negative affection for further development.
To begin with, a similar lifestyle would lead to losing indigenous cultures, traditional values, conventions and peculiar lifestyle that makes countries recognizable. It would mean that valuable knowledge and cultural heritage that has been developed by ages and identify countries might be lost. By contrast, adopting a different culture or way of life may in turn be a complete disaster and not suitable altogether. For instance, in Asian countries, admirable values such as patience, selflessness and respect for elders are still highly important today. If traditional values had been lost, they would have betrayed part of their personality.
In addition, the same lifestyle can give rise to a shortage of various mindsets and mentality. It may negatively affect the solution to global matters. To put in another way, similarity degrades innovations, then again, different lifestyle engages diverse perspective on life. For this reason, it can be testified by history, that many breakthroughs in medicine have been made by research teams of different nationality.
In conclusion, having embedded in everyday life, advancements in technology have made the entire world a global village. Some people think that it has a beneficial influence, while I do not agree. In my opinion, it would lead to not only losing the value of cultural diversity but also reducing new accomplishment due to a lack of various point of view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive affection for further development. To begin with, a similar lifestyle would...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3031358885 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01867264101 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2095813111 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182765547634 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563267611198 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485555735711 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107058583821 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403914101469 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.