Is often argue that tidiness whether at home or workplaces is essential for life. I firmly agree with this opinion and believe it has a positive effect on health and productivity.
To begin with, cleanliness and tidiness either at an office or at home obviously will obviously create clean and fresh air without harmful particles of dust, which in turn will affect health. This is because a well-organized room means a lack of unnecessary clutter and extra dusty surfaces. Thus, having tidied up, people eliminate potential triggers of respiratory diseases such as asthma. Otherwise, even healthy individual might be exposed to dangerous dust full of germs and particles. Furthermore, fresh air and uncluttered room probably influence mental health since they may relieve stress levels caused by stuffy and cavernous room and allow to breathe easily.
In addition, a well-organized spot contributes to being productive. To put it another way, it seems to can reduce the time for looking for necessary stuff unless it is in the right place. For instance, saving crucial time looking for a momentous document such as ID cards, passports. Moreover, keeping the workplace clean and neat may give rise to putting thoughts in order and motivate to be collected. It would mean that making the right decisions and creating new ideas in a spacious neat spot, would be significantly easier than working in cluttered stuffy rooms with lots of distractions. Therefore, saving time on finding things or fulfilling tasks with intense productivity is quite effective in a well-organized place where everything is ready.
In conclusion, living places and working ones should be kept neat, I am for this statement. In my opinion, it helps to maintain health due to elimination dusty spaces and surplus cluttered, also it leads to being more productive without wasting time for seeking out.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 651, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'breathing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: breathing
... by stuffy and cavernous room and allow to breathe easily. In addition, a well-organized ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2119205298 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88456782671 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655629139073 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8389792015 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.933333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13749631374 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474181437407 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035709214229 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900909773592 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384800587952 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.