Economic growth is the only way to end world poverty. However, some people says it leads to environment damage and should be stopped.
To what extend do you agree.
It is thought by some that there is only one solution to tackle poverty is economic growth but others argue that it is harmful for the environment and ought to be terminated. In my opinion, while industrialization damage the environment, I believe that we should proceed to develop as it will help us to save earth in future.
With the development of technologies humankind tend to damage environment more and more. The reason to this is that in order to produce more goods and technical items for people, companies and governments build many new factories. Consequently, these factories release to the atmosphere big amount of exhaust fumes. In addition, with the development of economy population is growing and people have to travel big distances and they have to use more cars and buses, which also harmful for the environment. As a result, big amount of exhaust fumes cap the sun heat inside the atmosphere, which causes greenhouse effect the main reason of global warming.
On the other hand, I believe that humankind should proceed to develop as it might help us to create new ways to save our environment and treat damages that we made. Nowadays, scientists create more developed technologies and as world is concerned about environment issue they create environment –friendly technologies. Moreover, scientist created ways to avoid using fossil fuels which are very expensive and harmful for our planet. For example, wind, solar, nuclear and wave energies are beneficial for the environment and people, as it helped to people to create electric engines. Hence, with the development of economy people develop and create technologies that are environment-friendly.
In conclusion, although people use sources that damage the earth, I consider that with the development of economy and technology we will find ways to live without damaging the earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...evelop as it will help us to save earth in future. With the development of technologies ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02705393998 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5798064295 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.230769231 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149597614528 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574709189063 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492355514219 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102795606156 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491879635843 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.