The chart below shows the amount of profit made by a SMG entertainment a record company from different formats in three European countries and are measured in million euros

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the amount of profit made by a SMG entertainment (a record company) from different formats in three European countries and are measured in million euros.

The two bar charts illustrate how much money SMG entertainment (a record company) earned in five different sales sectors in Germany, France and Italy in 1997 and 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest amount of money SMG entertainment earned through CDs bought in shops in two years in all countries and that Germany citizens spend the more money on it than others.
In 1997, People from Germany spent on CDs bought in shops more than 40 million euros then for the following 10 years the profit decreased exponentially to 25 million, but I was the highest amount of money that SMG earned. France and Italy spent on it 25 and 20 in 1997 then the sales went down to 15 and 14 million respectively. Expenditures on cassettes in Italy accounted for 7 million and in Germany and France people spent the same amount of money about 5 million euros after ten years they spent on it 0.
With regards to other sources of music, Germany and France spent on CDs bought online 3 and 1.5 million euros respectively in 1997 and after ten years they spent on it three times more. Citizens of all three countries did not spend any money on internet downloads in 1997 but for the following 10 years the expenditures on it accounted for about 5% in Germany and France and about 2% in Italy. Expenditures on Vinyl singles and LPs comprised no more than 5 million euros in all three countries in 1997 and after 10 years sales comprised of 0.

Votes
Average: 5.7 (17 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53281853282 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50616924888 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.8548328787 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.75 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.375 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172520700716 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881664864914 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474032941076 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120563319659 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361971030584 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.59 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.