Economic growth in in recent years made some people in both developed countries and
developing countries richer. However, research showing that while people in developing
countries are happier, people in developed countries seems no happier than before. Why?
What can we learn from it?
It seems to be an increasingly widespread concern about people in developed countries is not happier than those who in developing countries, despite that fact that thanks for the advance of economic development, citizens in those countries are richer. In my opinion, the reasons for this phenomenon are dwellers focus to much in creating prospects and overlook the important emotional things.
It is obvious that dwellers in undeveloped countries have to suffer from a lot of critical issues such as environmental pollution, poor health - care and social systems, and so on. So when those countries become developing, all such things have been improved and provide better living conditions for citizens and make them happier than before. By contrast, developed countries already have a lot of best conditions for residents, basic products could not meet their continuously increasing wishes, so they are not satisfied with their life which already the best in other foreign people.
In addition, in order to maintain the prospect of developed nations, employees must work harder and spend more time and stress at work. In result, they have less time for relaxing and enjoy life. For example, Americans work more than 8 hours per day, even working at weekend. Of course, they have limited time with family, friends and for entertainment. So, the fast pace of life is the drawback of economic growth in wealthy countries.
Throughout this phenomenon, we might learn the way to reach the balance between working time and relaxing time in order to have a happier life. Furthermore, satisfactory with what we have is the essential ideal lifestyle that we should follow. If we already met necessary requirements for good life, we should happy for this and not pursuit other unnecessary things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... for this phenomenon are dwellers focus to much in creating prospects and overlook...
^^
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d not pursuit other unnecessary things.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, well, for example, in addition, of course, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21453287197 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7705453474 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595155709343 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5009988283 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.923076923 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17119320267 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567193645959 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899114359305 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11347347812 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975743286846 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.