In this modern era of society, education are more and more prevalent for not only young people, but also adults who are not literate. Some people assumed that more government's budget should be spent for these adults. In my viewpoint, i partly agree with this statement.
To begin with, it can be seen clearly that investing on illiterate adults can brings some plus points. First of all, most of them have their own job at present but they do not have academic knowledge because they cannot read and write. As a result, education will help them develop comprehensively. Furthermore, the rate of literate people is always directly proportion to the developed rate of a nation. Not only this, it can also reduce the crime statistics and society's vice, which devotes to the growth of this nation.
Nevertheless, education in adults population who cannot read and write should be invested in a reasonable level. As can be seen, young people are the crucial feature for a country's wealth. Moreover, they have an ability to study better and faster than adults. Therefore, it must be totally wrong if government spend too much money and only concentrate on these adults citizen. In addition, adults received this education must be chosen carefully, which bases on their present job, ability to learn and remember, devotion for society, and so on.
In conclusion, like everything else, spending on education in adult inhabitant who are not literate also has two faces. Thus, we should make full its positive effects and notice some listed notes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
...uch money and only concentrate on these adults citizen. In addition, adults received t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01945525292 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61603060058 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610894941634 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3615253606 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286371396711 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928804279471 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846653210736 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176575161035 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752315205334 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.