Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single.Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. others disagree.
Discuss both views and you opinion.
Employees’ features can play a vital role in attaining a job. Some argue that the applicants for a certain job should provide a sufficient information for the employer, even if that include some privet information, such as hobbies, interests and marriage state. However, other believe that such details are un worthy. This essay will discuss both views followed by the authors’ opinion.
Firstly, marriage state, free time activities and habits are key information for employer who is searching for the optimum candidate. In addition to the person qualification, this information plays a vital role to select the best employee. For example, many companies provide health insurance, accommodation, and working insurance for the worker; consequently, the individual who has a big family may not have any preference to get this position. Accordingly, extra information is essential for job owners to secure a sufficient benefit for their organizations and for the employees.
On the other hand, additional details about the employees can not significantly change the employer decision. The most important concept in competitive marketing domain is the qualification of the employees. For example, even if he has a big family or many requirements, individual who has an efficient knowledge and substantial experience in a specified field will be selected for such position because he can avoid the employer many mistakes in the work, which may worth invaluable. Therefore, asking for more information is a wasting time process and more attention must be paid for employee’s skills and experiences.
In conclusion, while it is important to know more about the employees, many people believe that such information reduce the opportunity to employ the right person. In my opinion, I think that extra information about the candidates is useless and the qualifications and skills of individuals should be considered more in making decision.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25519072662 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2281992959 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.285714286 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333401499474 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108765131021 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592347582386 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1976245422 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427755259772 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.