Some people say that in all levels of education from primary school to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills .
Do you agree or disagree?
Success in developing a high qualified individual is an important goal in competitive job marking. Many argue that the time spent on learning theoretical concepts should be dedicated to obtain feasible skill. I agree that lecturers/teachers must concentrate more on subjects by which students can efficiently be competitive in work condition. This essay will analyze the reasons supporting this thesis.
Firstly, there are no enough skills to be used in practical and working fields. The working environment is substantially different from what is learnt in the laboratories and classrooms. For example, according to survey published by university of Queensland journal, 80% of graduated students have not sufficient skill required in the working fields. Hence, practical knowledge must be improved and significantly considered in education system.
Secondly, in primary and secondary schools many materials have been taught without any application after graduation. For instance, in my country, Some foreign languages, such as France and Kurdish are taught, and students need an obvious time and efforts to pass such subjects. However, the benefit of these subject after graduation for the majority of student is not worthy. Therefore, learned material should be carefully selected and discussed between the instructors and students.
In conclusion, the real life required many practical skill, which is not be obtained in classrooms. Further, even many stressful subjects are taught in academic stages, these subjects are unnecessary in real life. Consequently, I totally, agree that more attention should be paid to practical skills compared to learning theoretical facts in different education levels.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gn languages, such as France and Kurdish are taught, and students need an obvious...
^^
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pass such subjects. However, the benefit of these subject after graduation for th...
^^
Line 4, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ect after graduation for the majority of student is not worthy. Therefore, learne...
^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be paid to practical skills compared to learning theoretical facts in different...
^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o practical skills compared to learning theoretical facts in different education...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77075098814 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10025073585 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624505928854 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6679069499 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188252701723 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588559485019 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577733616993 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106856246436 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230723788263 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.