Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, our planet is facing the destruction of the environment. Some people believe that it seems only governments are responsible for the natural conservation and individuals do not take responsibility in protecting environment because individuals just play an insignificant role in tackling with this problem. Personally, I completely disagree with this view.
There is a variety of reasons why both the governments and humans in the world should save the Earth. I would argue that individuals do not have to solve environmental problems. Firstly, human activities are the main cause of the devastation of nature. For example, people are cutting down forest for providing wood for fuel, making land for housing, industries. This can lead to global warming by increasing the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. Therefore, individuals are responsible for their destructive activities and they should improve environment.
Secondly, when the governments promulgate policies and organize public campaigns about natural conservation, the citizens should obey the laws and contribute to protect the ecosystem. For instance, some countries impose “green taxes” on industries and encourage their residents in using public transport rather than driving. Consequently, the countries decrease the environmental pollution, global warming and increase government budget.
However, I would agree that there are several serious environmental problems that governments play the most important role of resolving this problem. This is because our Earth are suffering a lot of natural disasters such as flooding, rising sea levels, frequent droughts and greenhouse gases. Therefore, only the countries and organizations have a huge amount of money and time for reducing and preventing natural problems, because the government has a much greater resources than an individual does.
In conclusion, it is clear to me that government must address the problem of environmental destruction, and I disagree that individuals is not responsible for saving natural environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79276315789 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20334446667 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575657894737 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2148143384 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209858404342 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714931478869 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837008299104 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132872410211 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760225684888 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.