Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion?
It is true that an increasing number of languages are gradually disappearing from our lives. Some people argue that this trend enables people to enjoy an easier life. I largely agree with the opinion.
There is no doubt a decreasing number of languages benefits individual’s life in various aspects. First of all, fewer languages means governments can spend cut on the investment of interpretation services. With the saving on public funds to be allocated to the construction of infrastructures like schools and public transport system, the quality of life will be tremendously improved. Moreover, in regards to the effectiveness of communication, the extinction of some dialects reduces the misunderstanding and disputes among people. This is because every language is structured by particular grammatical rules and some unique words. The inappropriate utilisation of the language undoubtedly generates utter confusions.
Admittedly, those who oppose the above views may also possess some sound points. In particular, the disappearance of certain languages leads to the loss of some knowledge, which impairs the inheritance and development of the knowledge system, especially when it comes to the study of traditional cultures and customs. Nevertheless, those kind of knowledge system as the languages used to record the information are usually spoken by the specific minority groups. The dwindling of these dialects is unlikely to impact our normal lives. Therefore, it is unreasonable to say people’s daily life will be negatively influenced by fewer languages.
In conclusion, although the die out of some languages causes some loss of cultural and knowledge heritage, I am support of the idea that this trend makes our lives more convenient and enjoyable.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
a decreasing number of languages benefits individual’s life
a decreasing number of languages benefit individual’s life
schools and public transport system
schools and public transport systems
----------------------
flaws:
better not to use those pattern sentences, like:
it is true....
There is no doubt...
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 270 350
No. of Characters: 1461 1500
No. of Different Words: 165 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.054 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.411 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.16 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 107 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 70 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.157 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.309 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.499 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.031 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...ill be tremendously improved. Moreover, in regards to the effectiveness of communication, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...nal cultures and customs. Nevertheless, those kind of knowledge system as the languages us...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, in conclusion, in particular, kind of, no doubt, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57777777778 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32157597249 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614814814815 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8804608906 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336137935577 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998989850612 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628057628412 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1938782117 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501597207886 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.