Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
As the world is gradually developing towards globalisation, more uncommon languages die out every year. Some people may even suggest that it would be easier if there are only several languages remain. I completely agree with this opinion due to several reasons, particularly the communication understanding aspect relating to this.
First of all, while I agree that we should respect the cultural diversity, however, if there are fewer languages in the world, people can easily communicate their thoughts and ideas to their foreign partners without having to rely on the help of translation devices. They will not have to worry about being misunderstood and as a result, no conflicts or cultural differences will arise during negotiations or discussions. People can find the common ground easier when they communicate by the same language.
Second, if there are only few languages remain, it might be easier to learn and to be fluent at those languages as well as saving time and effort. This is also one criteria to become globalized citizens and to adapt with the rapid change of the world. For instance, even though the majority of Chinese people speak Mandarin, it is a requirement that they learn another language when doing business with their foreign counterparts, and English would be a useful one to start with.
In summation, preserving cultural uniqueness through languages is a good thing, however, it would be more beneficial and practical if fewer languages are available, as it would create effortless communication flows among inhabitants of the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one criterion', 'a criterion', or simply 'criteria'?
Suggestion: one criterion; a criterion; criteria
...as saving time and effort. This is also one criteria to become globalized citizens and to ad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, well, while, as to, for instance, as a result, as well as, first of all, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2619047619 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91031865069 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4951966687 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.6 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383657977495 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143645542813 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590207609125 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228380774392 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118504065855 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.