Should you pay taxes that support universal education? This is a debatable topic. Many affluent families send their children to private schools for better facilities and teaching methods that enable a holistic development of a child. This trend has a sever impact on the working class families that aspire to provide the best for their wards. Many individuals pay taxes to support universal education that their children do not avail.
Undoubtedly, the lack of funds is the primary reason for the deplorable condition of government schools. Firstly, the lack of infrastructure, the money allocated is insufficient to build a good infrastructure. For example, in a country like India many schools do not have the basic amenities such as a library, a play ground, and classroom. Secondly, inadequate training for the teachers. For example, there is no specialized university in India for teachers that imparts an innovative and creative approach to teaching.
Interestingly, there is a surplus flow of money in private institutes. Firstly, the state of art infrastructure. For example, the National School has a robotics lab, a colossal library, and a huge football ground. Secondly, well trained and innovate teaching methods. For example, the teachers are trained to teach children with varied learning abilities. They receive special training to help children with special needs.
In conclusion, although the quality of education in private institutes are better, the lack of funds is the reason for the inefficiency in running a government school. Hence, taxes that support universal education is very crucial for a developing country like India where many people are impoverished. However, in my opinion, you must pay taxes only for the services that you would avail.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40287769784 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99161224126 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528776978417 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0643135595 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0526315789 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6315789474 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220871194914 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733507965074 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08584896784 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146119208475 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114274300367 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.