Social media has been developing every day. Celebrities were attracting more attention than in the last decades when magazines and TV were the most important ways to convey meaning. Some believe that stars maintain their ideas in some subjects that are not experts and it is harmful advancements while others claim it has positive effects on the society. I would rather agree with the former group. I will discuss both views and then, I am going to explain mine.
On the one hand, some people count various reasons to prove the positivity of sharing celebrities' ideas with the public. Firstly, they believe the legendary people can aware the public about different issues like greenhouse emissions or water scarcity. Then, people by following the instructions could enhance the situation. Another reason that they maintain is that they could expand kindness and caring attitude on the public. As an example, Jennifer Lopez is trying to improve African lifestyles by taking advantage of her reputation.
On the other hand, some consider sharing stars' ideas with the public as a negative development. They maintain the lack of knowledge in all matters as a reason. A few decades ago, when social media was not developed, people had studied public problems. They used to follow experts' advice, while people are less follow their suggestions now, which may lead to misleading the society. Furthermore, some well-known persons may abuse their fame for personal purposes. For example, some celebrities support some regulations and deny others to assure their financial success.
Turning to my opinion, I reckon sharing celebrities' ideas about subjects that are not their professions has several disadvantages. It may mislead society and correcting their actions may cost colossal money and even lives. For instance, some celebrities encouraged the public to avoid vaccination for Covid-19 and it costs the lives of thousands of people.
In conclusion, although some may claim several advantages for distributing starts' opinions, it has several drawbacks on the public.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34049079755 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70449356543 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579754601227 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4596398666 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.05 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236109830836 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662457761687 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565819283683 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121150261767 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550259730083 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.