Films and games can be accessed at any time from mobile devices, the smart phones, tablets and laptop computers. Do the advantages of such developments outweigh the disadvantades?

In today’s rapidly changing globalized world, the issue of immediate access to different entertainment mediuns from your pocket devices has become one of the most controversial issues, requiring immediate attention. It is undeniable that this phenomenon has its pros and cons.
One evident benefit of fast and easy access to the internet is that you never get bored, wherever you are and whatever you are doing. In other words, you can always entartain yourself, for example, while you commute to and from work in an underground train or a bus. Or, if you are standing in a long line for a movie. In addition to this, another reason that devices can be a useful aspect, is that there are many beneficial applications, which provide a fruitful way to learn foreign languages. As is known, in order to learn languages quickly and effectively you need to practice by absorbing little portions of information on a daily basis. As far as this is concerned, scientists recommend to spend 10 minutes per day in lieu of 5 hours once a week. Smartphones precisely ensure quick access to a myriad of resources whenever you want.
On the other hand, pocket devices are a source of constant disturbances, and they do not allow you to focus on the tasks at hand. As a result, it can lead to detrimental consequences such as bad marks in school, diminishing of productivity or generally losing concentration on a variaty of other crucial tasks. Secondly, it is without a doubt that these appliances can grab all your attention and consequently can result even in emergencies. Let us imagine that a young person is crossing a road, staring at his mobile phone and not noticing an approaching vehicle. They can, and have been hit by it.
In conclusion, while there are negative points of using mobile devices every second, in general, it can be very advantageous as long as you are not losing all of your attention and your over connection with reality.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 686, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend spending'.
Suggestion: recommend spending
...As far as this is concerned, scientists recommend to spend 10 minutes per day in lieu of 5 hours o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84384384384 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90587987218 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603603603604 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6453373763 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.533333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125924783008 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376578780569 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263875892753 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742113036217 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029283952617 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.