Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Finance is an essential component of everyone’s life, and money management is a necessary skill that one should acquire and practice during his / her earning period in life. Here it is stated that teaching the basics of finance should be made part of the school curriculum. Education on finance appears to be useful and worthwhile for higher secondary school students, while it seems impractical for lower classes, as it may turn out to be beyond their comprehension.
Including sessions on finance would help the students in many ways. If classes on finance are made compulsory, the students will get the preliminary understanding of the importance of money and its management. This would probably develop in them a saving habit, by which they can generate a portion of their educational expenses such as tuition fees and other daily expenditure. It will relieve their parents to a great extent, as many of them are struggling hard day in and day out to meet the educational expense of their children.
Additionally, the lessons on finance would be beneficial for the students in their later life. Once they get these classes, they would be able to manage money very judiciously which would also positively influence the family budgeting and help maintain the income-expense equilibrium. Financially successful people are found to have undergone financial classes in the schools.
At the same time, it is preferable to exclude these lessons from primary classes. One reason is that lower class students will probably find it difficult to follow such deliverance. If the classes are beyond their comprehension, it would negatively affect their learning skills. Moreover, schools should give more importance to learning the necessary skills such as reading, writing and arithmetic at the primary level.
In conclusion, it appears that classes on finance and its management are excellent and even essential for senior class students as it would prove beneficial to them both in the present and future life. However, it may be avoided in primary classes, due to the intricacies involved in such lessons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-29 | Bhimani Nikunj | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-01 | Eric Liu | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-31 | Aryun | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-04 | Benny Joseph | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-11 | vipanbhatia | 56 | view |
- Some people think that human history has been a journey from ignorance to knowledge. Others argue that this underestimates the achievements of ancient cultures, and overvalues our accomplishments. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 73
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that vertical city is the best where people live and work in tall buildings Others think that horizontal city is better where there are few tall buildings Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Whoever controls the media also controls opinions and attitudes of the people and there is little can be done to rectify this 87
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, in conclusion, such as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26923076923 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92600983854 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520710059172 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6776186965 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3125 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117349578109 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401160189353 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389067310648 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065496295154 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438891734646 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.