Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development?
There is little room for doubt that fossil fuel has always outweighed others when it comes to energy sources. In my opinion, while many assert the finding of source alterations has retarded the country’s development, it still has some redeeming features worthy of consideration.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that the replacement of fossil fuel by some other sources will cause great difficulties to the government of some nations. To begin with, it is a task of challenge to seek a source that is as common, reasonably priced and unaffected by weather as fossil fuel. In fact, many renewable sources like solar energy or energy generated from windmills have been put into practice, however they all have demonstrated their shortcomings under natural phenomenons. Besides that, since most of national budget originates from taxpayers’ income, the government should give allocation for other fields that benefit the majority of citizens, particularly education. For example, instead of lavishing on research to find other fuels, the authority should cater for the needs of children from poverty-stricken areas in Vietnam who still have not been gaining access to rudimentary knowledge at schools.
On the other hand, the research on alternative power source should be supported as it can offer enormous advantage for the long term growth of one country. First and foremost, changing from non-renewable to renewable power will cause less damage to the environment, resulting in the improvement in living quality. It is reported that in some heavily-polluted metropolises like Beijing and New York, exhaust fumes coming from fuel-driven cars is the main cause of air pollution, leading to million cases of lung cancer every year. Hence, the alteration in the use of energy source will help governments attain the goal of sustainable development. Second, the urge to find new power source will augment the citizens’ activities in the field of science and technology. For example, the growing number of gasoline-operated bus have been put in use as a replacement for traditional bus which mainly run by the use of petrol and oil.
In conclusion, although the act of finding other energy sources to supersede fossil fuel encounters many problems, I think the positive outcomes of it will outperform those drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ming features worthy of consideration. On the one hand, it is undeniable that t...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to rudimentary knowledge at schools. On the other hand, the research on alter...
^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...main cause of air pollution, leading to million cases of lung cancer every year. Hence,...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inly run by the use of petrol and oil. In conclusion, although the act of findi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, however, if, second, so, still, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34417344173 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10537416148 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574525745257 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.0598284035 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3571428571 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234416079337 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867808861471 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618118306524 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1590637487 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276117409068 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.