Fossil fuels (coal,oil or natural gas) are the main sources in many countries. However,in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind and solar energy) are encouraged. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Along with the rapid growth of worldwide industries, more and more energy are required for maintenance mechanical systems. Besides the utilization of conventional sources like fossil fuels, many nations have shifted their approaches to support the use of alternative ones. In my opinion, this is a positive trend.
Firstly, it is admitted that fossil fuels are limited and unsustainable. They are taken from the underneath of our surface where prehistoric animals were buried and disintegrated. The process to turn raw bodies into fossil usually takes up to thousand years. However, the rate at which we burn energy is even exponential the velocity of forming the energy sources theirselves. Hence, no matter how many death animals we have, these sources will run out one day and it is a must for us to seek for others to substitute the missing pieces.
Secondly, traditional fuels are predicted to be the cause of world war 3. Similarly to the reason for World War 2 which was due to the conflict in sharing colonies and benefits among the Allies and the Axis, causing the death of hundred thousand of citizens. Fighting over fuels is the incentive of the forecasted biggest war between industrialized countries including The United States and China due to the lack of energy to supply for developing technologies and automatic production. Thus, an efficiency way to stay away from this bloodshed is to create your own energy supply using available sources such as wind and solar.
Thirdly, our planet has become more and more polluted because of the gas emissions from transportation and industrial activities using fuels. Those activities have triggered serial effects, for example global warming or water pollution and air pollution. The situation get even worse when Amazon, the largest forest in the world was nearly burnt out as a result of strong wind and the lack of authority’s care last month. Those mention problems bring out enormous concern among governments for renewable yet eco-friendly sources. In this way, wind and solar energy are optimum options.
In conclusion, the encouragement of nations for alternative resources is a correct decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... bodies into fossil usually takes up to thousand years. However, the rate at which we bu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 75, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...edicted to be the cause of world war 3. Similarly to the reason for World War 2 which was...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 304, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'forecasted the biggest'.
Suggestion: forecasted the biggest
...ting over fuels is the incentive of the forecasted biggest war between industrialized countries in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and solar energy are optimum options. In conclusion, the encouragement of nati...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, third, thirdly, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26285714286 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88458818198 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8716397973 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05555555556 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208689902337 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604493541556 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581245028274 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104319563704 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045689276258 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.