Fossil fuels are main resource and valuable material for majority of territories. There are believes that these types of fuels should be replaced with safer origin of energy such as wind or water. In my opinion, both of them have several drawbacks and advantages that none of them can be eliminated.
To begin with, fossil fuel is worthwhile for countries on account of it takes long time to be created. Besides, it is popular among areas which is named black gold due and it has various usage. For instant, coal is a treasure to produce diverse glasses and crystals that there is no alternative material for it yet. However, these genres of energy are practical in many fields, it is a main reason for contamination that stem from transportation vehicles and factories. Poisonous substances are speared in air which causes number of diseases.
On the other hand, some people suggest that other kinds of energy resources such as solar or wind are quit better to apply. I do not agree with this idea completely owing to some reasons. Firstly, generating these types of energy is costly that required powerful financial support. Secondly, these sources only can be applied for specific issues. For example, numerous products are constructed merely with oils or coal. Although these resources of energy are safer than fossil fuels, and they are functional for many novel gadgets and autos, they can never work as gas or oil.
In conclusion, I think both of energy origins are beneficial enough to apply in different matters. In fact, none of the solar or wind energy would use fossil fuels because they are separated matters.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94890510949 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55301296898 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594890510949 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2316451945 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.75 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234894122161 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680225518786 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584784482099 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136907134278 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424253917311 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.