In the dominant technological time, high-tech is used for all types of cars like buses and trucks; accordingly, passengers will be served without drivers shortly. In my opinion, the idea will bring more likely benefits than drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are many concerned options what the advantages are brought. First, controlling vehicles like cars and motorbikes will be easier than when the driverless cars have attached a chip to know how it runs and avoid complex barriers. Moreover, when the government can manage all positions and action dates of citizens’ vehicles ( cars, buses, etc.,) combined with the enactment of new rules, which help our society resolve traffic jams and reduce pollution; accordingly, the social security system will protect personal safety from traffic accidents. Secondly, people can spend time doing other tasks like checking crucial mail, preparing for assignments, r complete works that workers have finished yet before. Taking less time for sleeping as a prime example, when you need to stay awake at midnight and then get up early to work; as a result, you will be half asleep, half-awake in the morning leads to accidents quickly. As if having an auto-car will help you add some hours to sleep enough and effective-work is better.
On the other hand, the devices also have different drawbacks. First, using auto cars is easy or difficult depending on the different ages; in particular, senior citizens usually have dementia, so forgetting to press important keys will happen, and this problem is so dangerous. Furthermore, they need to write the address where they want to go, while they cannot see alphabets lead to press wrong words, it will bring many dangerous results.
In conclusion, the advantage of driverless vehicles is so giant; however, they need to make sure safe individuals combine invent more suitable than for older people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and action dates of citizens’ vehicles cars, buses, etc., combined with the ena...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, in conclusion, in particular, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19344262295 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66106730956 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675409836066 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.2062135939 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3333333333 7.06120827912 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259740370969 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840832050224 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062890191035 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141024904049 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651704861403 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.