In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
In the future, there will be no need for drivers in all vehicles due to the assistance of automatic robots. Part of society opine this would be hazardous and disadvantageous. However, i myself reckon that the merits will outweigh the demerits.
One the one hand, it is a common belief that robotic drivers will bring about numerous drawbacks, one of the is the odds that human drivers will be unemployed and emotionless robots sometimes make fatal mistakes or get confused in such dilemmas that even a smart human being will have have difficulties in making rational decisions. For example, if an automatic train face a kid as an obstruction on rail, we ourselves cannot ascertain whether it will hit the kid or turn to another direction to destroy other non-living things. In contrast, i think these exaggerated phobias and scenarios are nearly nothing compared to the huge benefits high-tech drivers can give humanity.
To be specific, the biggest and most fundamental perks that driverless vehicles can bring to passengers and society in general is that: they never get drunk or sleepy. Recently taken surveys have proven that over 70% street accidents are attributable to drunk and careless drivers. Thus, the whole society will suffer less from these severe accidents with the help of robots. Another advantage is that robotic drivers will probably reduce the price of the majority of transportations, especially the public ones. This is because companies will no longer spend money on recruiting employees and the only thing they will have to concentrate on is the quality of the driverless vehicles. Moreover, in the long term, staffs who are originally drivers, will be jobless and this will benefits other economies. For instance, instead of being drivers, they can work for other co-operations and have better lives rather than dealing with driving hazards.
In conclusion, while there are sill some disadvantages that driverless vehicles can give us, most of these drawbacks are quite personal and based on particular individuals' phobias. It is evident that our future will be brighter thank to the huge merits of robotic drivers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et confused in such dilemmas that even a smart human being will have have difficu...
^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: have
...mas that even a smart human being will have have difficulties in making rational decisio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...hat even a smart human being will have have difficulties in making rational decisio...
^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...y other non-living things. In contrast, i think these exaggerated phobias and sce...
^
Line 5, column 779, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
... drivers, will be jobless and this will benefits other economies. For instance, instead ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18103448276 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77381322975 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8473874868 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.2 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334517638556 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109584016213 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671470157808 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212414798485 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390720416345 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.