In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think that more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to overpopulation, lack of space is actually a fundamental issue worldwide, so it is said that the investment for investigating a new planet is admittedly essential. From my perspective, I partly agree that it is practical to put money into planet researches.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why seeking new planet should be supported. Firstly, because of the significant increase of human population, the globe has no more spacious areas for them to live in. For example, in 2017, it is just 29% of the Earth covered by land, but the global population is shooting up over 9 billion people. In other words, were human only to destroy all of wild habitats, they would have enough space to survive. Secondly, there is no doubt that naturally unrenewable resources are gradually scarce; and finding another source, in terms of industrialization and modernization, is extremely emergency. Thus, planet investigation, which is invested by the government or any international organizations, is the most opportune, effective and realistic way to tackle those problems.
On the other hand, in spite of these above agreements, it is argued that spending money for this kind of research is wasteful and impractical. In reality, despite the same solar system, no planet could bear resemblance to the Earth. Air, water, soil and especially gravity, are the most typical characteristics that human is able to tolerate and accommodate to live in. By the way of illustration, although a new planet – such as Mars – has a diversified source of needed materials and some similarities with the globe, liquid water cannot exist in its surface. That means only if human equip the innovational techniques which are frequently costly to take the underground water, they could survive in Mars. Additionally, instead of wasting money to carry out the expensive and unreliable researches, government should pay more attention to control the birth rate as well as design the high-rise building to deal with overpopulation.
In conclusion, a new planet could be taken into consideration as the solution for lack of space. However, to ensure which planet human could live in requires an enormous investment to research. Looking for the solution is positive and necessary, but making it become a reality is much more important.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, such as, as well as, by the way, in other words, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18882978723 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14812741195 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598404255319 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.76152304609 294% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0330274603 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.764705882 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1176470588 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8235294118 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201432426229 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573420801719 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341837829544 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116008476312 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297516146537 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.