In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live on , such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is true that living on this planet may be more struggling in the near future, thus, it is thought that there should be further investments in searching for other alien civilizations such as Mars to reside in. Personally, I somewhat agree with this opinion because the population is alarmingly rising and there may be a serious scarcity of fresh water and natural resources; however, the allocation for the amelioration of living standards is also indispensable.
The main reason why I believe that research about other planets should receive more fundings is that the population is on the period to escalate considerably. To be more specific, according to the recent survey, the global population has climbed to 83 million people on an annual basis and there is a prediction that the number of people in 2050 may reach 9,8 million people. Subsequently, the research into new planets is of the utmost importance because more space will compensate for the lack/ scarcity of land for (every individual)/ inhabitants on Earth. In addition, due to the rapid/ burgeoning growth of the population could lead to the depletion of natural resources namely freshwater and fossil fuels, causing the impossibility of serving residents’ demands.As a result, only when a new planet is explored do people stand a better chance of having sufficient resources to consume.
However, it does seem reasonable that national and local authorities have to be responsible for the current living conditions. As a matter of fact, in today's fast-paced life along with the increasing demand for consumption, citizens have to struggle with a variety of environmental-related obstructions. Subsidies, therefore, have to be spent on the improvement of facilities and the solutions to those severe social issues. As an illustration, if money is allocated for the renovation and conversion of the eco-transport system, the emissions from petrol-used transports will be cut down which alleviates the carbon footprints released to the ozone layer. In other words, the Earth could be liveable for billions of creatures and humanity in the future.
In conclusion, I am somewhat of the opinion that the discovery of new planets should be funded because of the overpopulation and a dearth of natural resources. However, I admit that the expenses for various aspects of life are also vital. Given the situation, it seems that a balance of expenditure should be imposed to benefit citizens adequately.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 767, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...ssibility of serving residents’ demands.As a result, only when a new planet is exp...
^^
Line 5, column 890, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...having sufficient resources to consume. However, it does seem reasonable that na...
^^^
Line 6, column 756, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f creatures and humanity in the future. In conclusion, I am somewhat of the opin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26835443038 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15726755396 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8403519819 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.642857143 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2142857143 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279096502825 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895363293951 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608070376721 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161170477763 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606618071879 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.