In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In today’s world, these recent years witnessed a rapid pace in the development of technology. Due to this, it is very convenient for people to read everything they want online without paying any extra costs. Therefore, it is thought that in the future, no one will buy printed newspapers or books. However, I remain unconvinced with this statement.
To begin with, the most frequent factor against this point is that newspapers and books are the reliable sources. To put it in another way, they provide more accurate information for readers than online resources. One example to demonstrate this claim is that in Vietnam, the content of a newspaper is always inspected strictly by many organizations prior to being printed out. Besides, there are also many rigorous laws issued by the government to ensure the exact news being printed. Meanwhile, the information updated day by day on the media on the Internet is not censored in a careful way. That means the level of precise news from these resources is lower than from newspapers of bools. Hence, printed newspapers will continue being used in the future because of its benefit related to worthy information published.
In addition, one explanation to oppose this statement is that reading printed papers still bring pleasure to some specific groups of people. To clarify, people in some particular areas cannot gain news through the Internet. This is shown by the following example. In Eritrea, Internet access is all government-controlled and less than 1% of the total population reportedly go online. As a result, people in this area still rely on printed newspaper or books to gain information. For that reason, printed newspapers or books will play an important role in our society in the future.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that in the future printed newspapers and books will be bought because of its positive aspects regarding to the information and the advantages for people who are out of reach Internet. Consequently, I totally disagree with the view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-28 | huynguyen3726 | 56 | view |
- With the development of technology and science some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musicians and painters What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot Should we encourage the art area 61
- Cultural and historical education gained through museums and can also be gained through the Internet Museums should be closed to give way to the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Some people think healthcare should be free for everyone Others think that people should pay for their medical costs themselves Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Many people believe that it s better to learn something in a group rather than individually Do you agree or disagree 61
- The plans below show the changes of the particular area from 1965 to the present day and plans also give a description of proposed changes Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 578, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful way" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e media on the Internet is not censored in a careful way. That means the level of precise news f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1223880597 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8952515645 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573134328358 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7358050172 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3157894737 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354147514109 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934364067163 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729424360381 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216364270003 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564144487511 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.