The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly widespread, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems?
there is no denying that the unfair distribution of wealth has become more seriously these days. Unfortunately, it brings some negative effects on society as a whole. this essay will analyze its influence and recommend some practical methods to tackle this issue.
there is a number of adverse impacts of wealth inequality on the economic growth of the country and the security of its citizens. In term of national economy, the existence of a substantial number of low-income people can lead to a significant decline in revenue of businesses. this is mainly because impoverished people who occupy a large proportion of the population do not have money to buy companies' products. In term of social security, the wider gap between rich and poor paves the way for the rise of the level of crime. To be more specific, financial hardship enables worse-off individuals to participate in illegal acts, such as prostitution or robbery to make ends meet. Besides, the underlying cause of these criminal behaviors may be from the resentment of their economic position.
However, there are several effective ways that we could carry out to solve this situation. Firstly, the authority should follow social policies that are aimed at reducing tax for low-income residents. Take my own country, Vietnam as an example. In Vietnam, people having monthly income below ten million Vietnam dongs will be eligible for revenue-tax exemptions. Secondly, the poor need to be received a higher qualified education. In other words, we should establish more modern and well-equipped schools in poor areas. this will provide worse-off citizens with essential knowledge and skills that help them make an honest living.
In conclusions, it can be said that the disparity between the rich and the poor may exert some adverse influences on whole society. Nevertheless, if the measures mentioned above are implemented properly, this problem will be alleviated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there is no denying that the unfair distribut...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...negative effects on society as a whole. this essay will analyze its influence and re...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ctical methods to tackle this issue. there is a number of adverse impacts of wealt...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...icant decline in revenue of businesses. this is mainly because impoverished people w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...nd well-equipped schools in poor areas. this will provide worse-off citizens with es...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28155339806 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87594309581 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63430420712 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4761962073 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172955888832 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045414604183 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043145451578 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999810072914 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398161209087 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.