Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend. It should be limited.
To what extent do you agree?
Genetically modified organisms have become a common phenomenon in modern life. This, however, poses a threat to the health of its consumer; therefore, genetic engineering should be heavily regulated by authorities. Although GM crops are cheaper in production, I strongly believe, that every food ought to be prohibited before its safety is proven by scientists.
From one side, genetic engineering allows to significantly reduce expenses during of agricultural industries. This can be achieved by targeted changes in the DNA of an organism, giving it a property that is desired by a farmer. This means that food suppliers are able to increase a size of a plant, to make it resistant against insects, to extend the freshness period, which entail the reduction of the final price in a grocery store. For example, according to the New York Times survey, genetically modified food costs 40 per cent less on average in the United States of America. Thus, this technology can safe a significant amount of earnings to regular citizens.
However, gene engineering is a very recent field of study that does not possess enough evidence regarding its negative effects on human bodies. Moreover, as new methods of gene modification are developed each year, the verification of different possible effects on people that consume GM food become more complicated. Therefore, the massive production of each GM plant should be allowed only after careful research on its influence on human health, which should be a primary goal of every government. For instance, the golden rice, which is a genetically modified regular rice that was introduced in Indonesia two years ago, caused a number of deaths last year. In other words, every food has to be tested by a reputable institution before it is supplied.
In conclusion, genetical engineering may be the boon for society due to its ability to get desired properties, but I think that the regulation of this industry is necessary.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17554858934 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93392813092 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611285266458 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.276681993 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.928571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161165746376 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561555962847 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502138063406 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1075935063 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287835216427 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.