Giving detailed description of crimes in newspapers and on TV can have negative consequences, so it should be restricted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the question of whether detailed crime reports on newspapers and televisions can have negative effects still remains a source of controversy. While I acknowledge that detailed crime reports are beneficial to a certain extent, I am of the opinion that these reports are more unfavorable. Therefore, I agree with this statement.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that detailed crime reports are favorable to a certain degree. The main advantage is that they can help individuals have relevantly suitable ways to protect themselves. No doubt, when being constantly updated with detailed crime events, people might develop a profound and comprehensive insight into the currently social status. As a result, they might be more conscious about the crime's well-being, then imposing appropriate ways to avoid being involved in crimes.
Notwithstanding the above-mentioned upside, it is true that detailed reports on crimes are disadvantageous. The major drawback is that they can exert adverse impacts on citizens’ mental well-being. Indeed, when being excessively exposed to the burgeoning amount of crime news, people are typically over-anxious about social safety. As a consequence, this may put individuals more susceptible to a wide range of mental illnesses, which then might wreak havoc on their health well-being. The second drawback is that detailed crime reports can ignite people’s negative perspectives against the government. In fact, in many cases, people have a tendency to blame all the crimes on the government when facing seriously severe crime cases; as a result, this can proportionally make people hold a grudge against the authorities, being skeptical of social safety.
In conclusion, while detailed crime reports can be beneficial to a certain extent because they help people have feasible approaches to protect themselves, I espouse the notion that these reports are unfavorable because they may spark people’s decline in mental health and citizens’ negative perspectives against the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
It is true that the question of whether detailed crime reports on newspapers an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, second, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, as a result, in many cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5641025641 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08833354356 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1269166985 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223742830424 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878991627147 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484364656808 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156811357754 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279111823419 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.