Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves. Do you agree or disagree?
Recent decades have witnessed the proliferation of advanced technology. While technological development is beneficial to a certain extent, I am of the opinion that advanced technology is more unfavorable. Therefore, I agree with this statement.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that the outbreak of modern technology is favorable. The main benefit is that this can help people to acquire comprehensive knowledge about the world. Indeed, due to technological advances, individuals nowadays can easily get in touch with people throughout the world regardless of language and nationality, which proportionally might deepen users’ understanding of different cultures. As a result, this may help people broaden their visions about all aspects of the world.
Notwithstanding the above-mentioned upside, it is true that technology is unfavorable. One of the major drawbacks is that this can ignite relationship decline. No doubt, when being immersed in cyberspace, individuals may suffer the severely acute poverty of face-to-face interaction. As a consequence, this might trigger misunderstandings and then relationship deterioration between individuals. The second drawback is that modern technology might lead to citizens’ health decline. In fact, when being excessively exposed to screens, people are typically susceptible to a wide range of both mental and physical problems. As a result, this might severely wreak havoc on society’s health well-being.
In conclusion, while modern technology is beneficial to a certain extent because it may widen people’s knowledge, I espouse the notion that this is more unfavorable because it can spark society’s relationship decline and health deterioration.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.868 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50137115999 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.0150773354 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152618970456 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508440897367 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424645216823 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101773656168 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256599087497 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.47 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.