Giving detailed descriptions of crimes in newspapers and on television… media should be restricted.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the restriction of providing detailed criminal information in newspapers or other electronic media programs is very necessary. From my perspective, I totally agree with this opinion since specific reports of crime have a negative impact on psychology and social security.
The main reason why I believe this view is because heinous criminal news has a psychological influence on people. For elder people, when they watch detailed information related to violent and sensational crimes, the visualization of violence frightens people and disturbs their peace of mind. For children who are at their behavioral developmental phase, are more susceptible to adopting negative behavioral leanings, and are likely to imitate the criminal actions blindly. To illustrate, a 5- years old girl in Vietnam died after imitating a Youtube video about the challenge of “strangling but still breathing”.
Another reason why I support the notion that the media should refrain from publishing specific information on crimes is that providing that news directly affects social security. Those who are immoral behavior would learn how to plan and implement crimes regardless of any place and object. To illustrate, an incident caused uproar in VietNam that an Estonian man slapped the butt of a Vietnamese woman in an elevator, which is usually crowded with people, and threatened to kill her if she reported to the police. In addition, some criminals may be attracted by the experiences of other criminals to avoid being arrested by the police. For instance, a would-be criminal could learn the importance of concealing his fingerprints after seeing a report about how a criminal was captured by police when his fingerprints were exposed.
In conclusion, I completely agree that revealing specific details of crimes on media should be limited. This is that detailed criminal news will be harmful to psychology and social security issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43092105263 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97522484252 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595394736842 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1333691949 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160525982385 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657260231414 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810135511023 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126710075312 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877596504403 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.